My £5-a-day starter plan to build a regular second income by 2030 and beyond
Story by Mark Hartley
My £5-a-day starter plan to build a regular second income by 2030 and beyond.
What’s a second income worth ? How much effort’s considered a fair amount to dedicate to building towards one ? Many people take on two jobs to earn an extra income, waking early and working late into the night.
Set and forget
A core tenet of this strategy is ‘set-and-forget’. Once it’s set up, it can be left to do its thing without further action. All it requires is saving £5 a day and investing it into the portfolio. With certain accounts, this can be automated to occur monthly.
This is considered a good strategy for beginner investors because it avoids the risk of panic-selling. Investors lacking market experience are more likely to make mistakes by trying to actively manage a portfolio. Often, a portfolio has a better chance of growing if left to its own devices.
That is, assuming the right stocks are chosen. Volatile growth stocks in emerging industries are not the way to go here, as their futures are uncertain. A better option could be an investment trust or index fund with a long history of solid performance.
The ETF’s enjoyed annualised growth of 8.7% over the past 10 years. Since it’s highly diversified across almost all markets in the world, it’s resilient against a downturn in any individual region or industry. Even though past performance isn’t indicative of future results, I believe its growth trajectory’s fairly reliable.
An investment of £5 a day could grow to around £13,600 in five years. Even with a decent dividend yield, that would only return around £100 a month of income. That’s why it’s best to start as soon as possible and think long-term. Investing in the stock for 20 years could grow the pot to £100,000. Shifting that much capital into a portfolio of high-yield dividend stocks could pay out around £670 a month.
While that may not sound like much, it requires a small investment, little effort and minimal risk. A fiver a day seems like a small price to consider.
The post My £5-a-day starter plan to build a regular second income by 2030 and beyond appeared first on The Motley Fool UK.
We think earning passive income has never been easier
Do you like the idea of dividend income?
The prospect of investing in a company just once, then sitting back and watching as it potentially pays a dividend out over and over?
Are you excited by the thought of regular passive income payments, as well as the potential for significant growth on your initial investment ?
Investment trusts offer a world of opportunities to tap into but how can investors sort the wheat from the chaff ? In our Investing Analyst column, experts run the rule over what’s on offer.
In this column, Thomas McMahon, Head of Investment Companies Research, at Kepler Partners, looks at how to get really get trusts to deliver on dividends.
The activism of Saba Capital, which I discussed in my last column, has created a challenge for all boards of investment trusts and we are already seeing its effect.
It certainly seems possible that this was behind the series of measures announced by abrdn Asian Income Fund (AAIF) recently.
The trust will now hold a continuation vote every three years, and has also decided to massively boost the dividend it pays out, which should rise to c. 7 per cent on an annualised basis, when accounting for the current discount.
These measures had an instant impact on the share price, which saw a decent bounce in the following days. I’m pretty sure it will have been the dividend policy that has led to this reaction, judging by past such announcements.
What the board has decided is that they will pay out a fixed percentage of the net asset value (NAV), which is essentially the value of the underlying holdings.
This is to be 1.5625 per cent of NAV each quarter, which equates to 6.25 per cent annualised. As the trust’s shares are on a discount, the implied yield on the share price is higher, at c. 7 per cent at the time of writing.
This is almost 2.5 percentage points higher than the 10 year gilt yield, and from a portfolio which has the growth potential of Asian equities to offer too.
This sort of manufactured or enhanced yield has become increasingly popular in recent years. It is one of the features of the investment trust structure that can’t be replicated in the open-ended or ETF world.
Assuming they have first received the right shareholder permissions under company law, boards can essentially decide what dividend they want to pay out without any regard to what income they have earned.
In the jargon, this is described as ‘paying from capital’. I think this jargon misleads some people though. it gives the impression that there is a separate pool of capital and one of income, but really these are just accounting fictions.
Trusts can invest the dividends they receive, and then sell their holdings when they have to pay a dividend. There is no requirement to keep income in cash for distribution.
This is a mistake people often make when considering another feature of income-paying trusts: revenue reserves. This refers to past year’s income which can be held back by a trust for distribution in future years.
While we talk about it as being placed in reserve, all that really means is that an account is written up on a virtual ledger, while the money is invested back into the portfolio. When trusts pay from revenue reserves or from capital, they don’t have to keep cash on hand through the year but can simply sell some assets and pay the cash out.
These features of investment trusts thus offer incredible flexibility to boards and really underline the credentials of the investment trust structure as the preeminent one for income-seekers. Boards can draw up a dividend policy without worrying about the income received from the portfolio changing from year to year.
While paying from capital has some critics, the market’s judgement overall is clear.
Consider JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (JGGI), for example. At c. £3bn in market cap, JGGI is one of the largest trusts in the sector, and sits on the mid-cap FTSE 250, just below the threshold for FTSE 100 inclusion. While most of the AIC Global Equity Income sector is trading on a wide discount, JGGI has been on or around a premium for most of the past five years.
Performance has been really good, the trust being ahead of all other vehicles in the Global or Global Equity Income sectors over five years, as well as ahead of global equity indices. The dividend policy is to pay 4 per cent of NAV each year, from capital wherever necessary. This means the managers are completely free from the need to worry about picking income stocks and they can just invest where they think the best growth is.
Paying a dividend from capital therefore allows income investors to invest in high growth areas while still earning a substantial yield, and I think it is this combination of yield and the strong performance from investing in global growth equities, that has led to the premium rating.
Could biotech be an income and growth opportunity?
Another good example of growth combined with income is International Biotechnology Trust (IBT). As the name suggests, it invests in companies developing new medicines, from those in clinical trials to those that are already generating sales and profits. These companies don’t pay dividends themselves, but IBT has a similar policy to JGGI, paying 4 per cent of NAV out each year in a dividend.
Biotechnology looks pretty cheap by historical standards, and has been out of favour as the market has adjusted to high interest rates. This means that, unlike for JGGI, the discount on the shares is considerable at the time of writing, around 12 per cent. This does show that an enhanced yield on its own is not enough to assure a narrow discount.
I think biotech could be an area to benefit if the market starts to broaden out from large-cap tech, which has taken so much investor attention and cashflow in recent years, while large-cap pharma companies are desperate to replace their expiring patents, which should see takeovers of the earlier-stage companies like those in IBT’s portfolio.
The other trusts getting innovative with dividends
There are plenty of other trusts which pay a dividend from capital spread across all the major equity sectors. JPM has a whole suite of funds from Asia to Europe and the UK with an enhanced dividend, all of which have a growth-heavy investment approach.
In fact, in AAIF’s own sector, there are now three trusts with an enhanced yield: AAIF, JPMorgan Asia Growth & Income and Invesco Asia Trust (IAT). Interestingly, AAIF has seen its discount move in from being the widest in the sector to being in line with these other two trusts, which have discounts between 10 per cent and 11 per cent. Schroder Oriental income (SOI) is trading on a much narrower discount of 7.1 per cent, but has a lower yield and does not pay out of capital, with the income being purely ‘natural’. I think the crucial factor here is size: SOI has a market cap of around £650m while the others are all below £300m.
With IAT soon to complete a combination with Asia Dragon that will more than double its size, it may be that this is a catalyst for the discount to narrow, as a broader pool of professional investors can consider it.
One of the additional secrets behind JGGI’s success may be its size, which means it can be invested in by wealth managers and institutions which need to own large blocks of shares as well as retail investors.
Paying from capital hasn’t always been possible, but regulations have changed over the years. One of the pioneers of this approach was European Assets Trust (EAT), which adopted it in 2001. The trust pays 6 per cent of the closing NAV of the previous financial year in dividends, and the historical yield is 6.6 per cent at the time of writing.
The portfolio is invested in European smaller companies, not typically a great source of dividends, but a market with great growth potential. I think like IBT this is a slumbering growth market which should produce great returns at some point in the future when the market environment shifts.
Are these really dividends?
Not everyone approves of this sort of policy, although perhaps fewer people object each year as it becomes more established.
Sometimes people object that it is not really a dividend at all but just drawing down from capital. Imagine you had a cash account of £10,000 which paid you 5 per cent a year in interest, and you took out 6 per cent each year. Then you would be drawing down your capital. But in the case of equities, they go up over the medium term.
Now, nothing in finance is as certain as a law of physics, but there are all sorts of reasons to think this will continue to be the case. So we should expect to see any growth in an equity portfolio more than offset any contribution from capital to the dividend, assuming the board have struck the right balance and not committed to a truly excessive contributions from capital.
And crucially, it is always possible for the end investor to reinvest their dividends, in which case this isn’t a concern at all.
People sometimes choose to focus on the effect in a falling market. If the NAV is falling, and the trust makes a contribution from capital to the dividend, then the portfolio value will fall by more than the market. This is true, but over a medium to long-term investment horizon, we should expect the market to rise, and again, investors can simply choose to reinvest their dividends.
There is a short-term negative effect from this dynamic though: if the capital paid out is higher than the income earned, the fund will shrink and so costs will be higher for remaining shareholders. But funds without an enhanced dividend will also be shrinking when this happens thank so the falling market, and their costs rising too, so what we are really talking about is slightly magnifying this risk we take by investing in pretty much all funds.
What you need to watch out for
One issue you do have to watch out for with these strategies is the variability of the dividends. Paying from capital typically involves paying a fixed amount of NAV each year. Dividends therefore change as the NAV does, which means that if the NAV falls, next year, or next quarter, depending on the exact policy, the dividend might be lower.
Some investors might not like the irregularity this brings. Investment trusts can use revenue reserves to smooth dividends and provide very reliable payments. There are at least 51 trusts which have maintained or held their dividends for at least 10 years, largely due to the ability to build up reserves for when income falls.
During the pandemic, when dividends were cancelled by many companies, almost all equity income trusts were able to maintain their distributions to investors, unlike open-ended funds which have to pay out all income earned.
Buying a trust with an enhanced dividend might, therefore, mean accepting less regularity in the income stream received. Any effect of this could be moderated by owning other trusts with a natural income stream, high revenue reserves and an obvious commitment by the board to maintaining the dividend.
Investors don’t seem to mind this feature, judging by the generally positive impact on the discount an enhanced dividend has had.
Where things have come unstuck though, is when boards have changed the policy too often. This was a major problem for Invesco Perpetual UK Smaller Companies (IPU).
The trust paid 4 per cent of NAV, like many others discussed, with a big contribution from capital.
During the pandemic, presumably nervous about the drop in portfolio income – and maybe listening to the critical voices about the impact of this policy in a falling market – the board slashed its dividend target to 2 per cent of NAV, leading to the share price plunging.
Despite reverting to the 4 per cent target later on, the trust has never regained the very narrow discount it used to enjoy pre-pandemic.
I think the lesson is that investors are comfortable with enhanced, or manufactured yields, and they are comfortable with the variability from quarter to quarter, but they want a consistent policy over the medium to long term they can use to help build a portfolio.
Investors have been sucked back into bonds in recent weeks, looking to take advantage of a spike in yields early in January. Eventually, they will time this right, although the last few years have seen expectations for interest rate cuts, which would see bond prices rise, pushed back and watered down again and again and again.
With UK equity valuations being low, yields are also pretty high in that market too, with greater potential for price appreciation if rates stay higher for longer.
There are high dividend ETFs out there with decent yields, the iShares UK Dividend ETF having a trailing yield of 5.6 per cent at the time of writing. But I think when it comes to income, the advantages of investment trusts means that passive is a poor option.
High yields can be earned from all sorts of underlying growth markets, some of which are supported by bulletproof revenue reserves and some of which are raised well above the yields on bonds or ETFs thanks to the use of enhanced dividends.
All in all, it’s never been a better time to use investment trusts for income.
We estimate the number of funds trading at year-high discounts to net assets fell by 2 to 12 last week. Alternatives still dominate the list with nine names as high bond yields continue to weigh on sentiment and share prices. But which alternative fund, seemingly a permanent fixture on the list, is no longer among the 52-week high discounters?
By Frank Buhagiar
We estimate 12 investment companies saw their share prices trade at 52-week high discounts to net assets over the course of the week ended Friday 07 February 2025 – two less than the previous week’s 14.
Headline number of 52-week high discounters may be falling, but the number of alternatives remains stuck on nine: five renewables, one infrastructure, one leasing, two from private equity/growth capital. Concerns over higher bond yields, leading to higher discount rates and lower asset valuations continuing to weigh on sentiment.
Noticeno property company among the alternatives this week. Not even the up-until-now ever-present Ceiba Investments (CBA). For weeks the Cuban-focused property company has topped the list with a discount of around 75%. Not anymore. CBA’s discount ended the week at -73%ish. Okay not a big improvement, but an improvement, nonetheless. The reason, the Company’s press release of 3 February 2025 confirming that 85% of holders of its €25m 10% senior unsecured convertible bonds due 2026 agreed to amend the payment schedule of the bond from a single €25m bullet payment due on 31 March 2026 to five equal annual instalments of €5m starting in June 2025. The new maturity date is 31 March 2029. The previously looming deadline had been weighing on the share price hence the year-high discount. Question is, can the share price kick on from here or will CBA return to the Discount Watch in the not-too-distant future?
Top five
Fund Discount Sector
Digital 9 Infrastructure DGI9-80.70%Renewables#
Ecofin US Renewables RNEW-54.90%Renewables
VH Global Energy Infrastructure ENRG-54.01%Renewables
The Telegraph thinks the market has got it wrong when it comes to 3I Infrastructure (3IN) and believes the sell-off in the shares has been overdone; while The Times believes a radical overhaul at HarbourVest Global Private Equity (HVPE), which includes capital being returned to shareholders and a more simplified structure adopted, make the shares a hold.
By Frank Buhagiar
Questor – There’s a bargain to be had while markets misjudge this infrastructure trust
Sometimes share prices are weak for good reason. Other times, the weakness may be down to shares simply falling out of favour. Figuring out which applies, that’s the hard bit. Not enough to stop The Telegraph’s Questor from trying though. For the tipster “sees an investment trust trading at an unusually wide discount to net asset value (Nav) and wonders whether there is a bargain to be had – 3i Infrastructure (3IN) might fit that description.” Particularly as 3IN doesn’t follow the typical infrastructure fund model: take on debt; acquire/develop assets that provide essential services; generate “long-term and reasonably predictable income”. Instead, 3IN focuses on “core infrastructure businesses that could deliver a combination of capital growth and income, rather than just a predictable income stream. It is this that differentiates 3i Infrastructure from most other listed infrastructure trusts, which tend to offer higher dividend yields but lower overall total returns.”
It’s a model that has served 3IN well. Adjusting for the payment of a large special dividend in 2018, the average annual NAV total return over the last 10 years stands at around 14%, while the dividend has risen from 7p to 12.65p. Those numbers helped by the fund selling well: over the last 10 years, assets have been sold at prices that have generated an average 37% uplift to the values held on its books. That’s a track record deserving of a share price premium to net assets and for most of 3IN’s life that has been the case. This all changed in September 2022, however, so that today the shares trade at a 15%ish discount to NAV while “the share price has made little to no headway over the past three years.”
Questor puts that discount down to the higher interest rate environment, but points out that “in this respect, economic conditions today are much closer to those prevailing at the time when 3i Infrastructure was launched.” It’s not as if the fund has not been here before. What’s more “In its latest update, the 3i team indicates that the majority of the portfolio is performing ahead or in line with expectations. Questor believes the selloff in 3i Infrastructure’s shares is overdone.”
Tempus – Is it time to sell shares in HarbourVest Global Private Equity?
The Times’ Tempus thinks HarbourVest Global Private Equity (HVPE) “has often gone unnoticed by most DIY investors” because of the “seemingly perennial discount on the shares and a mistrust of private assets”. But this could be about to change thanks to “a radical overhaul at the trust”. Trigger for the overhaul, pressure from activist investor Metage Capital, that persistent discount to net assets and disappointing share price performance.
Among the changes being wrought: doubling the amount of cash being set aside for share buybacks; proposing a continuation vote at its annual meeting next year; and agreeing a more simplified investment structure with its manager, HarbourVest Partners, which will see the trust’s funds being put into a separate vehicle, thereby creating a more direct relationship between HVPE shareholders and its private holdings – previously these were “co-mingled” with other funds. It’s hoped this last change will go some way to making it easier for investors to understand the fund – HVPE invests in other funds, which in turn invest their assets into a wide range of private companies. Also, HVPE invests alongside other HarbourVest managed funds that focus on primary fund commitments, secondary investments and direct co-investments in operating companies. The fund invests in private credit too. In all, HVPE is exposed to over 1,000 different businesses. Easy to see why, the Board felt the need to simplify things.
Exposure to 1,000 companies does mean the fund is well diversified. Arguably a “one-stop-shop for a basket of privately owned assets” that has historically performed well: a +13% annualised NAV per share return between 2014 and 2024 compares favourably to the FTSE All World’s +10%. That long-term track record, those changes in the pipeline, including plans to return what Numis estimates could amount to US$235m to shareholders via buybacks, and “encouraging initiatives by the board to simplify a complex investment”, leads Tempus to think that now is not the time to sell the stock. Rather hold on and hopefully enjoy the ride.
ieves the sell-off in the shares has been overdone; while The Times believes a radical overhaul at HarbourVest Global Private Equity (HVPE), which includes capital being returned to shareholders and a more simplified structure adopted, make the shares a hold.
By Frank Buhagiar
The Telegraph thinks the market has got it wrong when it comes to 3I Infrastructure (3IN) and believes the sell-off in the shares has been overdone; while The Times believes a radical overhaul at HarbourVest Global Private Equity (HVPE), which includes capital being returned to shareholders and a more simplified structure adopted, make the shares a hold.
Questor – There’s a bargain to be had while markets misjudge this infrastructure trust.
Sometimes share prices are weak for good reason. Other times, the weakness may be down to shares simply falling out of favour. Figuring out which applies, that’s the hard bit. Not enough to stop The Telegraph’s Questor from trying though. For the tipster “sees an investment trust trading at an unusually wide discount to net asset value (Nav) and wonders whether there is a bargain to be had – 3i Infrastructure (3IN) might fit that description.” Particularly as 3IN doesn’t follow the typical infrastructure fund model: take on debt; acquire/develop assets that provide essential services; generate “long-term and reasonably predictable income”. Instead, 3IN focuses on “core infrastructure businesses that could deliver a combination of capital growth and income, rather than just a predictable income stream. It is this that differentiates 3i Infrastructure from most other listed infrastructure trusts, which tend to offer higher dividend yields but lower overall total returns.”
It’s a model that has served 3IN well. Adjusting for the payment of a large special dividend in 2018, the average annual NAV total return over the last 10 years stands at around 14%, while the dividend has risen from 7p to 12.65p. Those numbers helped by the fund selling well: over the last 10 years, assets have been sold at prices that have generated an average 37% uplift to the values held on its books. That’s a track record deserving of a share price premium to net assets and for most of 3IN’s life that has been the case. This all changed in September 2022, however, so that today the shares trade at a 15%ish discount to NAV while “the share price has made little to no headway over the past three years.”
Questor puts that discount down to the higher interest rate environment, but points out that “in this respect, economic conditions today are much closer to those prevailing at the time when 3i Infrastructure was launched.” It’s not as if the fund has not been here before. What’s more “In its latest update, the 3i team indicates that the majority of the portfolio is performing ahead or in line with expectations. Questor believes the selloff in 3i Infrastructure’s shares is overdone.”
Tempus – Is it time to sell shares in HarbourVest Global Private Equity ?
The Times’ Tempus thinks HarbourVest Global Private Equity (HVPE) “has often gone unnoticed by most DIY investors” because of the “seemingly perennial discount on the shares and a mistrust of private assets”. But this could be about to change thanks to “a radical overhaul at the trust”. Trigger for the overhaul, pressure from activist investor Metage Capital, that persistent discount to net assets and disappointing share price performance.
Among the changes being wrought: doubling the amount of cash being set aside for share buybacks; proposing a continuation vote at its annual meeting next year; and agreeing a more simplified investment structure with its manager, HarbourVest Partners, which will see the trust’s funds being put into a separate vehicle, thereby creating a more direct relationship between HVPE shareholders and its private holdings – previously these were “co-mingled” with other funds. It’s hoped this last change will go some way to making it easier for investors to understand the fund – HVPE invests in other funds, which in turn invest their assets into a wide range of private companies. Also, HVPE invests alongside other HarbourVest managed funds that focus on primary fund commitments, secondary investments and direct co-investments in operating companies. The fund invests in private credit too. In all, HVPE is exposed to over 1,000 different businesses. Easy to see why, the Board felt the need to simplify things.
Exposure to 1,000 companies does mean the fund is well diversified. Arguably a “one-stop-shop for a basket of privately owned assets” that has historically performed well: a +13% annualised NAV per share return between 2014 and 2024 compares favourably to the FTSE All World’s +10%. That long-term track record, those changes in the pipeline, including plans to return what Numis estimates could amount to US$235m to shareholders via buybacks, and “encouraging initiatives by the board to simplify a complex investment”, leads Tempus to think that now is not the time to sell the stock. Rather hold on and hopefully enjoy the ride.
The Telegraph thinks the market has got it wrong when it comes to 3I Infrastructure (3IN) and believes the sell-off in the shares has been overdone; while The Times believes a radical overhaul at HarbourVest Global Private Equity (HVPE), which includes capital being returned to shareholders and a more simplified structure adopted, make the shares a hold.
By Frank Buhagiar
The Telegraph thinks the market has got it wrong when it comes to 3I Infrastructure (3IN) and believes the sell-off in the shares has been overdone; while The Times believes a radical overhaul at HarbourVest Global Private Equity (HVPE), which includes capital being returned to shareholders and a more simplified structure adopted, make the shares a hold.
Questor – There’s a bargain to be had while markets misjudge this infrastructure trust.
Sometimes share prices are weak for good reason. Other times, the weakness may be down to shares simply falling out of favour. Figuring out which applies, that’s the hard bit. Not enough to stop The Telegraph’s Questor from trying though. For the tipster “sees an investment trust trading at an unusually wide discount to net asset value (Nav) and wonders whether there is a bargain to be had – 3i Infrastructure (3IN) might fit that description.” Particularly as 3IN doesn’t follow the typical infrastructure fund model: take on debt; acquire/develop assets that provide essential services; generate “long-term and reasonably predictable income”. Instead, 3IN focuses on “core infrastructure businesses that could deliver a combination of capital growth and income, rather than just a predictable income stream. It is this that differentiates 3i Infrastructure from most other listed infrastructure trusts, which tend to offer higher dividend yields but lower overall total returns.”
It’s a model that has served 3IN well. Adjusting for the payment of a large special dividend in 2018, the average annual NAV total return over the last 10 years stands at around 14%, while the dividend has risen from 7p to 12.65p. Those numbers helped by the fund selling well: over the last 10 years, assets have been sold at prices that have generated an average 37% uplift to the values held on its books. That’s a track record deserving of a share price premium to net assets and for most of 3IN’s life that has been the case. This all changed in September 2022, however, so that today the shares trade at a 15%ish discount to NAV while “the share price has made little to no headway over the past three years.”
Questor puts that discount down to the higher interest rate environment, but points out that “in this respect, economic conditions today are much closer to those prevailing at the time when 3i Infrastructure was launched.” It’s not as if the fund has not been here before. What’s more “In its latest update, the 3i team indicates that the majority of the portfolio is performing ahead or in line with expectations. Questor believes the selloff in 3i Infrastructure’s shares is overdone.”
Tempus – Is it time to sell shares in HarbourVest Global Private Equity ?
The Times’ Tempus thinks HarbourVest Global Private Equity (HVPE) “has often gone unnoticed by most DIY investors” because of the “seemingly perennial discount on the shares and a mistrust of private assets”. But this could be about to change thanks to “a radical overhaul at the trust”. Trigger for the overhaul, pressure from activist investor Metage Capital, that persistent discount to net assets and disappointing share price performance.
Among the changes being wrought: doubling the amount of cash being set aside for share buybacks; proposing a continuation vote at its annual meeting next year; and agreeing a more simplified investment structure with its manager, HarbourVest Partners, which will see the trust’s funds being put into a separate vehicle, thereby creating a more direct relationship between HVPE shareholders and its private holdings – previously these were “co-mingled” with other funds. It’s hoped this last change will go some way to making it easier for investors to understand the fund – HVPE invests in other funds, which in turn invest their assets into a wide range of private companies. Also, HVPE invests alongside other HarbourVest managed funds that focus on primary fund commitments, secondary investments and direct co-investments in operating companies. The fund invests in private credit too. In all, HVPE is exposed to over 1,000 different businesses. Easy to see why, the Board felt the need to simplify things.
Exposure to 1,000 companies does mean the fund is well diversified. Arguably a “one-stop-shop for a basket of privately owned assets” that has historically performed well: a +13% annualised NAV per share return between 2014 and 2024 compares favourably to the FTSE All World’s +10%. That long-term track record, those changes in the pipeline, including plans to return what Numis estimates could amount to US$235m to shareholders via buybacks, and “encouraging initiatives by the board to simplify a complex investment”, leads Tempus to think that now is not the time to sell the stock. Rather hold on and hopefully enjoy the ride.
